Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.102
Filter
2.
MAbs ; 15(1): 2212415, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20244250

ABSTRACT

As immunological selection for escape mutants continues to give rise to future SARS-CoV-2 variants, novel universal therapeutic strategies against ACE2-dependent viruses are needed. Here we present an IgM-based decavalent ACE2 decoy that has variant-agnostic efficacy. In immuno-, pseudovirus, and live virus assays, IgM ACE2 decoy had potency comparable or superior to leading SARS-CoV-2 IgG-based mAb therapeutics evaluated in the clinic, which were variant-sensitive in their potency. We found that increased ACE2 valency translated into increased apparent affinity for spike protein and superior potency in biological assays when decavalent IgM ACE2 was compared to tetravalent, bivalent, and monovalent ACE2 decoys. Furthermore, a single intranasal dose of IgM ACE2 decoy at 1 mg/kg conferred therapeutic benefit against SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infection in a hamster model. Taken together, this engineered IgM ACE2 decoy represents a SARS-CoV-2 variant-agnostic therapeutic that leverages avidity to drive enhanced target binding, viral neutralization, and in vivo respiratory protection against SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , COVID-19 , Animals , Cricetinae , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoglobulin M , Protein Binding
3.
Mol Pharm ; 20(7): 3494-3504, 2023 07 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243366

ABSTRACT

PEGylated lipid nanoparticle-based Covid-19 vaccines, including Pfizer's BNT162b2 and Moderna's mRNA-1273, have been shown to stimulate variable anti-PEG antibody production in humans. Anti-PEG antibodies have the potential to accelerate the plasma clearance of PEGylated therapeutics, such as PEGylated liposomes and proteins, and compromise their therapeutic efficacy. However, it is not yet clear whether antibody titers produced by PEGylated Covid-19 vaccines significantly affect the clearance of PEGylated therapeutics. This study examined how anti-PEG IgM levels affect the pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and compared the immunogenicity of a lipid nanoparticle formulation of linear DNA (DNA-LNP) to standard PEG-HSPC liposomes. DNA-LNP was prepared using the same composition and approach as Pfizer's BNT162b2, except linear double-stranded DNA was used as the genetic material. PEGylated HSPC-based liposomes were formulated using the lipid rehydration and extrusion method. Nanoparticles were dosed IM to rats at 0.005-0.5 mg lipid/kg body weight 1 week before evaluating the plasma pharmacokinetics of clinically relevant doses of PLD (1 mg/kg, IV) or PEGylated interferon α2a (Pegasys, 5 µg/kg, SC). Plasma PEG IgM was compared between pre- and 1-week post-dose blood samples. The results showed that anti-PEG IgM production increased with increasing PEG-HSPC liposome dose and that IgM significantly correlated with the plasma half-life, clearance, volume of distribution, and area under the curve of a subsequent dose of PLD. The plasma exposure of Pegasys was also significantly reduced after initial delivery of 0.005 mg/ml PEG-HSPC liposome. However, a single 0.05 mg/kg IM dose of DNA-LNP did not significantly elevate PEG IgM and did not alter the IV pharmacokinetics of PLD. These data showed that PEGylated Covid-19 vaccines are less immunogenic compared to standard PEGylated HSPC liposomes and that there is an antibody threshold for accelerating the clearance of PEGylated therapeutics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nanoparticles , Rats , Humans , Animals , Liposomes , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , Immunoglobulin M , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacokinetics , DNA , Phosphatidylcholines
4.
J Med Virol ; 95(5): e28805, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20243153

ABSTRACT

HH-120, a recently developed IgM-like ACE2 fusion protein with broad-spectrum neutralizing activity against all ACE2-utilizing coronaviruses, has been developed as a nasal spray for use as an early treatment agent to reduce disease progression and airborne transmission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HH-120 nasal spray in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. Eligible symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected participants were enrolled in a single-arm trial to receive the HH-120 nasal spray for no longer than 6 days or until viral clearance at a single hospital between August 3 and October 7, 2022. An external control was built from real-world data of SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects contemporaneously hospitalized in the same hospital using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. After PSM, 65 participants in the HH-120 group and 103 subjects with comparable baseline characteristics in the external control group were identified. The viral clearance time was significantly shorter in participants receiving the HH-120 nasal spray than that in subjects of the control group (median 8 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.001); the difference was more prominent in those subgroup subjects with higher baseline viral load (median 7.5 days vs. 10.5 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-related adverse events of HH-120 group were 35.1% (27/77) and 3.9% (3/77), respectively. All the adverse events observed were mild, being of CTCAE grade 1 or 2, and transient. The HH-120 nasal spray showed a favorable safety profile and promising antiviral efficacy in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. The results from this study warrant further assessment of the efficacy and safety of the HH-120 nasal spray in large-scale randomized controlled clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , COVID-19 , Humans , Nasal Sprays , SARS-CoV-2 , Cohort Studies , Propensity Score , Immunoglobulin M
5.
J Med Microbiol ; 72(5)2023 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242337

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Bosnia and Herzegovina (B and H) has been recognized for decades as a country with a high risk of diseases caused by hantaviruses.Gap statement. The severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has diverted attention from many pathogens, including hantavirus.Aim. To provide a socio-demographic, temporal, geographical and clinical laboratory overview of the expansion of hantavirus infection cases during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in B and H in 2021.Methodology. The RecomLine HantaPlus IgG, IgM immuno-line assay (Mikrogen, Germany) was used to detect IgG and IgM antibodies to hantavirus serotypes in human sera from clinically suspected cases.Results. In 2021 (January-October), the number of confirmed cases of hantavirus infection and tested persons (92/140; 65,71 %) was higher than in the previous 2 years, 2020 (2/20; 10.00 %) and 2019 (10/61; 16.39 %). Most of the infected persons were men (84/92; 91.30 %). Hantavirus infections were recorded from January to October 2021, and the peak was reached in July (25/92; 27.17 %). Six out of 10 cantons in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FB and H) were affected, namely Sarajevo Canton, Central Bosnia Canton, Neretva Canton, Zenica-Doboj Canton, Posavina Canton and Bosnian-Podrinje Canton Gorazde, in descending order. Of the 38/92 (41.30 %) infected patients with characteristic clinical manifestations of haemorrhagic fever, including renal (mainly) or pulmonary syndrome, 32/92 (34.78 %) were hospitalized in the Clinical Center of the University of Sarajevo. Two cases were detected with dual infection, hantavirus (Puumala) with Leptospira in one and SARS-CoV-2 in another case. The largest number of infections was related to Puumala (PUUV) (83/92; 90.22 %), while the rest of the infections were caused by the hantavirus Dobrava serotype (DOBV).Conclusion. The reported infections were probably caused by exposure of individuals to at-risk areas inhabited by contaminated rodents as natural reservoirs of hantavirus. As a highly endemic area, B and H requires continuous monitoring and increased awareness of this problem.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hantavirus Infections , Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome , Orthohantavirus , Male , Humans , Female , Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome/diagnosis , Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome/epidemiology , Bosnia and Herzegovina/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hantavirus Infections/epidemiology , Immunoglobulin M , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G
6.
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) ; 69(2): 79-83, 2023 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242246

ABSTRACT

The present study was done to evaluate hematological, immunological, and inflammation markers in male and female patients infected with COVID-19, ranging from moderate to severe cases in Erbil city of Iraq. The study included 200 samples (60 male, and 60 female patients infected with COVID-19). While 40 healthy males and 40 healthy females were used as a control group. The results found significant differences in total white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes, immunoglobin G (IgG), immunoglobin M (IgM), C-reactive protein (CRP), Ferritin, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) between healthy control and patients infected with COVID-19 in males and females. Patients with COVID -19 showed a significantly p≤ 0.001 higher value of total WBC, IgG, IgM, CRP, Ferritin, and ESR when compared with the control group in both males and females. The percentage of lymphocytes in male and female patients is significantly p≤ 0.001  lower than that of the healthy control group. No significant differences in red blood cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (HCT), and thrombocytes were observed between the control and patient groups in both males and females.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , Male , Inflammation , C-Reactive Protein , Ferritins , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M
7.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0287107, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20242214

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). RT-PCR detection of viral RNA represents the gold standard method for diagnosis of COVID-19. However, multiple diagnostic tests are needed for acute disease diagnosis and assessing immunity during the COVID-19 outbreak. Here, we developed in-house anti-RBD IgG and IgA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using a well-defined serum sample panel for screening and identification of human SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found that our in-house anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA displayed a 93.5% sensitivity and 98.8% specificity whereas our in-house anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgA ELISA provided assay sensitivity and specificity at 89.5% and 99.4%, respectively. The agreement kappa values of our in-house anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA ELISA assays were deemed to be excellent and fair, respectively, when compared to RT-PCR and excellent for both assays when compared to Euroimmun anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA ELISAs. These data indicate that our in-house anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA ELISAs are compatible performing assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G , Reference Standards , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin M
8.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1095162, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20239385

ABSTRACT

The historical and social vulnerability of quilombola communities in Brazil can make them especially fragile in the face of COVID-19, considering that several individuals have precarious health systems and inadequate access to water. This work aimed to characterize the frequency of SARS-COV-2 infections and the presence of IgM and IgG SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in quilombola populations and their relationship with the presence of risk factors or preexisting chronic diseases in the quilombola communities. We analyzed the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, serological status, comorbidities, and symptoms of 1,994 individuals (478 males and 1,536 females) from 18 Brazilian municipalities in the State of Sergipe of quilombola communities, which were evaluated at different epidemiological weeks, starting at the 32nd (August 6th) and ending at the 40th (October 3rd) epidemiological week. More than 70% of studied families live in rural areas and they have an extreme poverty social status. Although we found a higher number of SARS-COV-2 infections in quilombola communities than in the local population, their SARS-CoV-2 reactivity and IgM and IgG positivity varied across the communities investigated. Arterial hypertension was the most risk factor, being found in 27.8% of the individuals (9.5% in stage 1, 10.8% in stage 2, and 7.5% in stage 3). The most common COVID-19 symptoms and comorbidities were headache, runny nose, flu, and dyslipidemia. However, most individuals were asymptomatic (79.9%). Our data indicate that mass testing must be incorporated into public policy to improve the health care system available to quilombola populations during a future pandemic or epidemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M
9.
Microb Biotechnol ; 16(6): 1325-1332, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238892

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the diagnostic value of the combination of two broad-range PCR assays targeting two different and conserved regions of the viral genome for the diagnosis of acute Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection. Patients with acute hepatitis were prospectively recruited. In all, HEV-IgM antibodies were tested together with evaluation of HEV viraemia by two PCR assays (ORF3 and ORF1). The number of individuals exhibiting negative IgM antibody results but carrying viral RNA was calculated by each PCR assay. Four-hundred and seventy individuals were included, of whom 145 (30.8%) were diagnosed as having acute HEV. Of them, 122 (84.1%) exhibited HEV-IgM antibodies, and 81 (55.8%) had detectable viral RNA for at least one PCR. Using the ORF3 molecular assay, 70 (48.3%) individuals were identified with HEV infection. When the ORF1 molecular assay was applied, 49 (33.8%) individuals were identified. The ORF3 assay detected viral RNA in 32 patients not detected by the ORF1 assay. In contrast, the ORF1 assay could amplify viral RNA in 11 patients who were not detected by the ORF3 assay. The parallel use of two broad-range PCR assays significantly increased the performance of the molecular diagnosis of HEV.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis E virus , Hepatitis E , Humans , Hepatitis E virus/genetics , Hepatitis E/diagnosis , Hepatitis Antibodies , Immunoglobulin M , RNA, Viral/genetics
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(5): e2314291, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2325464

ABSTRACT

Importance: Cardiac dysfunction and myocarditis have emerged as serious complications of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Understanding the role of autoantibodies in these conditions is essential for guiding MIS-C management and vaccination strategies in children. Objective: To investigate the presence of anticardiac autoantibodies in MIS-C or COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This diagnostic study included children with acute MIS-C or acute vaccine myocarditis, adults with myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy, healthy children prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and healthy COVID-19 vaccinated adults. Participants were recruited into research studies in the US, United Kingdom, and Austria starting January 2021. Immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA anticardiac autoantibodies were identified with immunofluorescence staining of left ventricular myocardial tissue from 2 human donors treated with sera from patients and controls. Secondary antibodies were fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antihuman IgG, IgM, and IgA. Images were taken for detection of specific IgG, IgM, and IgA deposits and measurement of fluorescein isothiocyanate fluorescence intensity. Data were analyzed through March 10, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: IgG, IgM and IgA antibody binding to cardiac tissue. Results: By cohort, there were a total of 10 children with MIS-C (median [IQR] age, 10 [13-14] years; 6 male), 10 with vaccine myocarditis (median age, 15 [14-16] years; 10 male), 8 adults with myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy (median age, 55 [46-63] years; 6 male), 10 healthy pediatric controls (median age, 8 [13-14] years; 5 male), and 10 healthy vaccinated adults (all older than 21 years, 5 male). No antibody binding above background was observed in human cardiac tissue treated with sera from pediatric patients with MIS-C or vaccine myocarditis. One of the 8 adult patients with myocarditis or cardiomyopathy had positive IgG staining with raised fluorescence intensity (median [IQR] intensity, 11 060 [10 223-11 858] AU). There were no significant differences in median fluorescence intensity in all other patient cohorts compared with controls for IgG (MIS-C, 6033 [5834-6756] AU; vaccine myocarditis, 6392 [5710-6836] AU; adult myocarditis or inflammatory cardiomyopathy, 5688 [5277-5990] AU; healthy pediatric controls, 6235 [5924-6708] AU; healthy vaccinated adults, 7000 [6423-7739] AU), IgM (MIS-C, 3354 [3110-4043] AU; vaccine myocarditis, 3843 [3288-4748] AU; healthy pediatric controls, 3436 [3313-4237] AU; healthy vaccinated adults, 3543 [2997-4607] AU) and IgA (MIS-C, 3559 [2788-4466] AU; vaccine myocarditis, 4389 [2393-4780] AU; healthy pediatric controls, 3436 [2425-4077] AU; healthy vaccinated adults, 4561 [3164-6309] AU). Conclusions and Relevance: This etiological diagnostic study found no evidence of antibodies from MIS-C and COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis serum binding cardiac tissue, suggesting that the cardiac pathology in both conditions is unlikely to be driven by direct anticardiac antibody-mediated mechanisms.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Myocarditis , Adult , Humans , Male , Child , Adolescent , Middle Aged , Myocarditis/etiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Autoantibodies , COVID-19/prevention & control , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin A , Fluoresceins , Immunoglobulin M
11.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1183983, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2326180

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The duration and timing of immunity conferred by COVID-19 vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa are crucial for guiding pandemic policy interventions, but systematic data for this region is scarce. This study investigated the antibody response after AstraZeneca vaccination in COVID-19 convalescent Ugandans. Methods: We recruited 86 participants with a previous rt-PCR-confirmed mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 infection and measured the prevalence and levels of spike-directed IgG, IgM, and IgA antibodies at baseline, 14 and 28 days after the first dose (priming), 14 days after the second dose (boosting), and at six- and nine-months post-priming. We also measured the prevalence and levels of nucleoprotein-directed antibodies to assess breakthrough infections. Results: Within two weeks of priming, vaccination substantially increased the prevalence and concentrations of spike-directed antibodies (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon signed rank test), with 97.0% and 66% of vaccinated individuals possessing S-IgG and S-IgA antibodies before administering the booster dose. S-IgM prevalence changed marginally after the initial vaccination and barely after the booster, consistent with an already primed immune system. However, we also observed a rise in nucleoprotein seroprevalence, indicative of breakthroughs six months after the initial vaccination. Discussion: Our results suggest that vaccination of COVID-19 convalescent individuals with the AstraZeneca vaccine induces a robust and differential spike-directed antibody response. The data highlights the value of vaccination as an effective method for inducing immunity in previously infected individuals and the importance of administering two doses to maintain protective immunity. Monitoring anti-spike IgG and IgA when assessing vaccine-induced antibody responses is suggested for this population; assessing S-IgM will underestimate the response. The AstraZeneca vaccine is a valuable tool in the fight against COVID-19. Further research is needed to determine the durability of vaccine-induced immunity and the potential need for booster doses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , Antibody Formation , COVID-19 Vaccines , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Uganda , COVID-19/epidemiology , Vaccination , Immunoglobulin A , Nucleoproteins , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M
12.
Int J Public Health ; 67: 1604548, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2324885

ABSTRACT

Objective: We aimed to quantify SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies' seroprevalence among university students in Porto. Methods: A rapid point of care testing for SARS-CoV-2 specific immunoglobulin (Ig) M and IgG antibodies was performed, and a questionnaire was applied to 6512 voluntary students from September to December 2020. We computed the apparent IgM, IgG, and IgM or IgG prevalence, and the true prevalence and 95% credible intervals (95% CI) using Bayesian inference. Results: We found an apparent prevalence (IgM or IgG) of 9.7%, the true prevalence being 7.9% (95% CI 4.9-11.1). Prevalence was significantly higher among males (10.9% vs. 9.2%), international students (18.1% vs. 10.4% local vs. 8.8% nationally displaced), and increased with age. Those with a known risk contact, that experienced quarantine, had symptoms, or a previous negative molecular test had a higher seroprevalence. Of the 91 (1.4%) students who reported a molecular diagnosis, 86.8% were reactive for IgM or IgG. Conclusion: Based on immunological evidence infection was 5.6-fold the reported molecular diagnosis. The higher seroprevalence among male, older, and international students emphasizes the importance of identifying particular groups.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Male , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Immunoglobulin M , Bayes Theorem , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G , Students
13.
Euro Surveill ; 25(23)2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313322

ABSTRACT

We reviewed the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests. Random-effects models yielded a summary sensitivity of 82% for IgM, and 85% for IgG and total antibodies. For specificity, the pooled estimate were 98% for IgM and 99% for IgG and total antibodies. In populations with ≤ 5% of seroconverted individuals, unless the assays have perfect (i.e. 100%) specificity, the positive predictive value would be ≤ 88%. Serological tests should be used for prevalence surveys only in hard-hit areas.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Coronaviridae Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Serologic Tests/standards , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/standards , Coronavirus/isolation & purification , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Serologic Tests/methods , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/blood
14.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(7): 1081-1088, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314012

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has become a major public health problem after the outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus. Great efforts to contain COVID-19 transmission have been applied worldwide. In this context, accurate and fast diagnosis is essential. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated the clinical performance of three different RNA-based molecular tests - RT-qPCR (Charité protocol), RT-qPCR (CDC (USA) protocol) and RT-LAMP - and one rapid test for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that RT-qPCR using the CDC (USA) protocol is the most accurate diagnostic test among those evaluated, while oro-nasopharyngeal swabs are the most appropriate biological sample. RT-LAMP was the RNA-based molecular test with lowest sensitivity while the serological test presented the lowest sensitivity among all evaluated tests, indicating that the latter test is not a good predictor of disease in the first days after symptoms onset. Additionally, we observed higher viral load in individuals who reported more than 3 symptoms at the baseline. Nevertheless, viral load had not impacted the probability of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: Our data indicates that RT-qPCR using the CDC (USA) protocol in oro-nasopharyngeal swabs samples should be the method of choice to diagnosis COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Prospective Studies , Brazil/epidemiology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Health Personnel , RNA , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Sensitivity and Specificity
15.
Vaccine ; 41(28): 4183-4189, 2023 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2320920

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mechanism for anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination has been widely debated; understanding this serious adverse event is important for future vaccines of similar design. A mechanism proposed is type I hypersensitivity (i.e., IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation) to polyethylene glycol (PEG). Using an assay that, uniquely, had been previously assessed in patients with anaphylaxis to PEG, our objective was to compare anti-PEG IgE in serum from mRNA COVID-19 vaccine anaphylaxis case-patients and persons vaccinated without allergic reactions. Secondarily, we compared anti-PEG IgG and IgM to assess alternative mechanisms. METHODS: Selected anaphylaxis case-patients reported to U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System December 14, 2020-March 25, 2021 were invited to provide a serum sample. mRNA COVID-19 vaccine study participants with residual serum and no allergic reaction post-vaccination ("controls") were frequency matched to cases 3:1 on vaccine and dose number, sex and 10-year age category. Anti-PEG IgE was measured using a dual cytometric bead assay (DCBA). Anti-PEG IgG and IgM were measured using two different assays: DCBA and a PEGylated-polystyrene bead assay. Laboratorians were blinded to case/control status. RESULTS: All 20 case-patients were women; 17 had anaphylaxis after dose 1, 3 after dose 2. Thirteen (65 %) were hospitalized and 7 (35 %) were intubated. Time from vaccination to serum collection was longer for case-patients vs controls (post-dose 1: median 105 vs 21 days). Among Moderna recipients, anti-PEG IgE was detected in 1 of 10 (10 %) case-patients vs 8 of 30 (27 %) controls (p = 0.40); among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients, it was detected in 0 of 10 case-patients (0 %) vs 1 of 30 (3 %) controls (p >n 0.99). Anti-PEG IgE quantitative signals followed this same pattern. Neither anti-PEG IgG nor IgM was associated with case status with both assay formats. CONCLUSION: Our results support that anti-PEG IgE is not a predominant mechanism for anaphylaxis post-mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Anaphylaxis/etiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin E , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Immunosuppressive Agents , Polyethylene Glycols/adverse effects , RNA, Messenger , Vaccination/adverse effects
16.
J Immunol Methods ; 518: 113492, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detecting antibody responses following infection with SARS-CoV-2 is necessary for sero-epidemiological studies and assessing the role of specific antibodies in disease, but serum or plasma sampling is not always viable due to logistical challenges. Dried blood spot sampling (DBS) is a cheaper, simpler alternative and samples can be self-collected and returned by post, reducing risk for SARS-CoV-2 exposure from direct patient contact. The value of large-scale DBS sampling for the assessment of serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 has not been assessed in depth and provides a model for examining the logistics of using this approach to other infectious diseases. The ability to measure specific antigens is attractive for remote outbreak situations where testing may be limited or for patients who require sampling after remote consultation. METHODS: We compared the performance of SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibody detection from DBS samples with matched serum collected by venepuncture in a large population of asymptomatic young adults (N = 1070) living and working in congregate settings (military recruits, N = 625); university students, N = 445). We also compared the effect of self-sampling (ssDBS) with investigator-collected samples (labDBS) on assay performance, and the quantitative measurement of total IgA, IgG and IgM between DBS eluates and serum. RESULTS: Baseline seropositivity for anti-spike IgGAM antibody was significantly higher among university students than military recruits. Strong correlations were observed between matched DBS and serum samples in both university students and recruits for the anti-spike IgGAM assay. Minimal differences were found in results by ssDBS and labDBS and serum by Bland Altman and Cohen kappa analyses. LabDBS achieved 82.0% sensitivity and 98.2% specificity and ssDBS samples 86.1% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity for detecting anti-spike IgGAM antibodies relative to serum samples. For anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG there was qualitatively 100% agreement between serum and DBS samples and weak correlation in ratio measurements. Strong correlations were observed between serum and DBS-derived total IgG, IgA, and IgM. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest validation of DBS against paired serum for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody measurement and we have shown that DBS retains performance from prior smaller studies. There were no significant differences regarding DBS collection methods, suggesting that self-collected samples are a viable sampling collection method. These data offer confidence that DBS can be employed more widely as an alternative to classical serology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Young Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Dried Blood Spot Testing , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin M , Sensitivity and Specificity
17.
Front Immunol ; 13: 977443, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2316329

ABSTRACT

Thrombosis is a major clinical complication of COVID-19 infection. COVID-19 patients show changes in coagulation factors that indicate an important role for the coagulation system in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. However, the multifactorial nature of thrombosis complicates the prediction of thrombotic events based on a single hemostatic variable. We developed and validated a neural net for the prediction of COVID-19-related thrombosis. The neural net was developed based on the hemostatic and general (laboratory) variables of 149 confirmed COVID-19 patients from two cohorts: at the time of hospital admission (cohort 1 including 133 patients) and at ICU admission (cohort 2 including 16 patients). Twenty-six patients suffered from thrombosis during their hospital stay: 19 patients in cohort 1 and 7 patients in cohort 2. The neural net predicts COVID-19 related thrombosis based on C-reactive protein (relative importance 14%), sex (10%), thrombin generation (TG) time-to-tail (10%), α2-Macroglobulin (9%), TG curve width (9%), thrombin-α2-Macroglobulin complexes (9%), plasmin generation lag time (8%), serum IgM (8%), TG lag time (7%), TG time-to-peak (7%), thrombin-antithrombin complexes (5%), and age (5%). This neural net can predict COVID-19-thrombosis at the time of hospital admission with a positive predictive value of 98%-100%.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemostatics , Thrombosis , Antithrombins , C-Reactive Protein , COVID-19/complications , Fibrinolysin , Humans , Immunoglobulin M , Neural Networks, Computer , Predictive Value of Tests , Thrombin/metabolism , Thrombosis/etiology
18.
Front Immunol ; 13: 954801, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315271

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 and its mutant strains continue to rapidly spread with high infection and fatality. Large-scale SARS-CoV-2 vaccination provides an important guarantee for effective resistance to existing or mutated SARS-CoV-2 virus infection. However, whether the host metabolite levels respond to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-influenced host immunity remains unclear. To help delineate the serum metabolome profile of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated volunteers and determine that the metabolites tightly respond to host immune antibodies and cytokines, in this study, a total of 59 sera samples were collected from 30 individuals before SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and from 29 COVID-19 vaccines 2 weeks after the two-dose vaccination. Next, untargeted metabolomics was performed and a distinct metabolic composition was revealed between the pre-vaccination (VB) group and two-dose vaccination (SV) group by partial least squares-discriminant and principal component analyses. Based on the criteria: FDR < 0.05, absolute log2 fold change greater than 0.25, and VIP >1, we found that L-glutamic acid, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), succinic acid, and taurine showed increasing trends from SV to VB. Furthermore, SV-associated metabolites were mainly annotated to butanoate metabolism and glutamate metabolism pathways. Moreover, two metabolite biomarkers classified SV from VB individuals with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96. Correlation analysis identified a positive association between four metabolites enriched in glutamate metabolism and serum antibodies in relation to IgG, IgM, and IgA. These results suggest that the contents of gamma-aminobutyric acid and indole in serum could be applied as biomarkers in distinguishing vaccinated volunteers from the unvaccinated. What's more, metabolites such as GABA and taurine may serve as a metabolic target for adjuvant vaccines to boost the ability of the individuals to improve immunity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Biomarkers , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cytokines , Glutamic Acid , Humans , Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Indoles , Metabolomics , SARS-CoV-2 , Succinic Acid , Taurine , Vaccination , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
19.
Front Immunol ; 13: 953043, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314969

ABSTRACT

Background: At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there was a lack of information about the infection's impact on pregnancy and capability to induce de novo autoantibodies. It soon became clear that thrombosis was a manifestation of COVID-19, therefore the possible contribution of de novo antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) raised research interest. We aimed at screening SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant patients for aPL. Methods: The study included consecutive pregnant women who were hospitalized in our Obstetric Department between March 2020 and July 2021 for either a symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or for other reasons (obstetric complications, labour, delivery) and found positive at the admission nasopharyngeal swab. All these women underwent the search for aPL by means of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL), IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I (aB2GPI). Data about comorbidities, obstetric and neonatal complications were collected. Results: 151 women were included. Sixteen (11%) were positive for aPL, mostly at low titre. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 20 women (5 with positive aPL) and 5 required ICU admission (2 with positive aPL). Obstetric complications occurred in 10/16 (63%) aPL positive and in 36/135 (27%) negative patients. The occurrence of HELLP syndrome and preeclampsia was significantly associated with positive aPL (p=0,004). One case of maternal thrombosis occurred in an aPL negative woman. aPL positivity was checked after at least 12 weeks in 7/16 women (44%): 3 had become negative; 2 were still positive (1 IgG aB2GPI + IgG aCL; 1 IgM aB2GPI); 1 remained positive for IgG aCL but became negative for aB2GPI; 1 became negative for LA but displayed a new positivity for IgG aCL at high titre. Conclusions: The frequency of positive aPL in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was low in our cohort and similar to the one described in the general obstetric population. aPL mostly presented as single positive, low titre, transient antibodies. The rate of obstetric complications was higher in aPL positive women as compared to negative ones, particularly hypertensive disorders. Causality cannot be excluded; however, other risk factors, including a full-blown picture of COVID-19, may have elicited the pathogenic potential of aPL and contributed themselves to the development of complications.


Subject(s)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome , COVID-19 , Thrombosis , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/diagnosis , Autoantibodies , Cardiolipins , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Immunoglobulin M , Infant, Newborn , Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/complications , beta 2-Glycoprotein I
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL